[Lazarus] Testers wanted: FpDebug on Linux and Windows

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Lazarus] Testers wanted: FpDebug on Linux and Windows

Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list
It is time to get some feedback on how FpDebug behaves in the wild.

If you want to test it, you need:
- Lazarus 2.1  revision 62049 (dated 13 Oct 2019) or higher/later
- Fpc any version that above Lazarus works with.
   If you use FPC trunk, you should aim for revision 43183 or higher.
      earlier trunk will cause bad results inspecting bitpacked arrays
      3.0.4 is fine
      3.2 may depend on what gets merged when, and FpDebug may need
amendments if certain fpc fixes are merged.

As for what to expect:  https://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FpDebug

When reporting back:
- Your Lazarus and FPC version/revision.
- Your OS (with version and 32 or 64 bit)
- Your IDE is 32 or 64 bit
- Your FPC is 32 or 64 bit
- Your target app is 32 or 64 bit (and indicate if it was cross
compiled, by an FPC with different bitness)
- In case something failed, log output of (or preferably, a reproducible
testcase)
   lazarus.exe   --debug-log=file
--log-enable=DBG_STATE,DBG_DATA_MONITORS,DBG_ERRORS,DBG_VERBOSE,DBG_WARNINGS,DBG_BREAKPOINTS,DBG_FPDEBUG_VERBOSE,FPDBG_BREAKPOINT_ERRORS,FPDBG_BREAKPOINTS

Thank you



--
_______________________________________________
lazarus mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Lazarus] Testers wanted: FpDebug on Linux and Windows

Free Pascal - Lazarus mailing list
On 13/10/2019 17:59, Martin Frb via lazarus wrote:
> It is time to get some feedback on how FpDebug behaves in the wild.
Forgot:
It is recommended to test this with DWARF-3
However DWARF-2 is also supported. Please mention which one you tested.
--
_______________________________________________
lazarus mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus