2011/2/2 Graeme Geldenhuys <
[hidden email]>:
Thanks for verify the merge process. Apparently I marked it as merged,
but forgot to commit, or I simply made a mistake. Maybe it was just
too late.
>
> So how do we know if all the other merges to 0.9.30 really are merged or
> not?
>
By checking them all. There are several ways to do this. This page may help:
http://svn2.freepascal.org/svn/logs/lazarus-fixes_0_9_30.logThe list of merged revision can be found in the svnmerge-integrated
property of root of the branch.
vincent@fpclin32:~/src/lazfixes$ svn propget svnmerge-integrated
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_0_9_30/trunk:1-28809,28812-28814,28816-28826,28828-28847,28853-28854,28861,28863-28875,28877,28905,28907,28910-28912,28923,28925-28927,28930,28935,28937,28941,28963-28964,28978-28980,28982,29005,29021,29025-29027,29031,29035-29036,29061-29062,29067,29081-29084,29094-29100,29104,29112,29136,29138,29140-29141,29146,29157,29159,29181,29192-29193,29237,29296,29299,29316
Revision is not mentioned, so it was not merged.
Another indicator may be the fixed in target version on the bug
report. From time to time I go over the log messages in
http://svn2.freepascal.org/svn/logs/lazarus-fixes_0_9_30.log and
update the issues mentioned in the log message.The issue had still had
fixed in version 0.9.31.
Again thank you for giving this feedback, it is valuable to get a good release.
Vincent
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus